A Reply to Major Ross's Criticism
نویسنده
چکیده
on the reduction of the spleen rate, as a result of measures to remove water logging produced by the Western Jumna Canal, strongly support their view. As, however, Major Ross admits the possibility of a connection between the spleen rate and impure water being an explanation of the facts I have recorded, the point is of purely theoretical importance, for repeated blood examinations have convinced me that there is a definite relationship between enlarged spleen and the malarial type of anaemia and general ill-health in malarious places, so that if an improved water-supply will remove these, its introduction will have a greater effect on the health of the population than any feasible crusade against the mosquito; and my results retain all their practical importance. Major Ross's regimental experience, which agrees with
منابع مشابه
On Inequity Aversion A Reply to Binmore and Shaked
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked’s criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social preferences.
متن کاملREPLY Searching for Evidence , Not a War : Reply to Lindquist ,
Lindquist, Siegel, Quigley, and Barrett (2013) critiqued our recent meta-analysis that reported the effects of discrete emotions on outcomes, including cognition, judgment, physiology, behavior, and experience (Lench, Flores, & Bench, 2011). Lindquist et al. offered 2 major criticisms—we address both and consider the nature of emotion and scientific debate. Their 1st criticism, that the meta-an...
متن کاملAdequacy of authors’ replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether substantive criticism in electronic letters to the editor, defined as a problem that could invalidate the research or reduce its reliability, is adequately addressed by the authors. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING BMJ between October 2005 and September 2007. Inclusion criteria Research papers generating substantive criticism in the rapid responses section on bm...
متن کاملDeath and reductionism: a reply to John F Catherwood.
This reply to John F Catherwood's criticism of brain-related criteria for death argues that brainstem criteria are neither reductionist nor do they presuppose a materialist theory of mind. Furthermore, it is argued that brain-related criteria are compatible with the majority of religious views concerning death.
متن کاملA reply to Professor Seedhouse.
This brief reply gives a few references and clarifies some points in order to emphasize that a number of Professor Seedhouse's assertions are debatable and that his criticism of slovenly scholarship and his unbridled ad hominem argumentation are out of place and easily refuted.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 35 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016